Best PPPoker Bot: Six Tools for PPPoker Compared

PPPoker AI Software is one of six tools that come up when players search for a PPPoker bot. They differ in who they are built for, where they run, which PPPoker formats they cover and how they charge. This comparison uses only what each vendor states on its own website as of 20 September 2026; where a vendor does not publish something, such as a price, the table says so instead of guessing. The assistant on this site publishes a per-hand rate, $0.90 per 100 hands at NL $0.10/$0.20, and covers PLO5, PLO6 and OFC.

Download PPPoker AI Software

Table rating turning red: a lineup dominated by regulars with minimal profit potential, next to a PLO5 table with a bet prompt — Best PPPoker Bot: Six Tools for PPPoker Compared

PPPoker AI Software against the field, in short

For a player on a phone who wants live advice with a known price, PPPoker AI Software: Android and LDPlayer, every PPPoker format, 255+ opponent stats, $0.90 per 100 hands at NL $0.10/$0.20, free trial fuel. Desktop grinders who want a fixed licence look at Shanky or Warbot; club owners who want tables kept busy look at PokerNet, not at a player tool.

PPPoker bots side by side

The table lists what each vendor publishes about its own product. Blank cells mean the vendor does not state it, which is worth knowing in itself before you send money to a Telegram manager.

ToolBuilt forRuns onPPPoker formats statedPricing modelTrial
The assistantPlayersAndroid, LDPlayerNLH, PLO4, PLO5, PLO6, Short Deck, MTT, SNG, AoF, HU, OFCPer hand, published rateFree trial fuel
PokerBotAIPlayersAndroidNLH, PLO, PLO5, PLO6, OFCOn request via Telegram managersNot stated
CrownAIPlayersAndroid, Windows, iOS (vendor claim)NLH, PLO4, PLO5, PLO6, MTTOn requestFree test via Telegram bot
Shanky Holdem BotPlayersWindowsHold'em; separate Omaha bots including PLO5LicenceNot stated
WarbotPlayers and profile developersWindowsDepends on the loaded profileLicenceFree trial
PokerNetClub and union ownersManaged serviceNLH, PLO, Short DeckRevenue share, no upfront costNot applicable

Two of the six are not really competing with the others. PokerNet is an operator service that places bots in clubs to keep tables running, and Warbot is a framework that plays whatever profile you load into it. The remaining four are the real choice for a PPPoker player.

Club analysis report: EV and net win rate in BB per 100 hands by limit and game type, with recommended and not recommended tables — Notes on each PPPoker bot

Notes on each PPPoker bot

The assistant

An assistant for the PPPoker app on Android with an optional one-tap autoclicker. It tracks 255+ stats per opponent, rates open tables green, yellow or red, and supports every regular PPPoker format, including PLO5, PLO6 and OFC. It charges per hand from prepaid fuel: $1 buys 100 credits, a hundred hands at NL $0.10/$0.20 use 90 of them, fuel never expires and new players get trial fuel. The trade-off is platform: no iOS, and Windows only through the LDPlayer emulator. Details are on the pricing page.

PokerBotAI

An Android bot sold for several club apps, PPPoker among them, with NLH, PLO, PLO5, PLO6 and OFC listed. Sales and setup go through managers on Telegram, and the site publishes no prices; you find out the cost after a conversation. The room page is informative about PPPoker itself, with a verdict card on how bot-friendly the app is.

CrownAI

A PPPoker bot that advertises NLH, Omaha with four to six cards and MTT, optional HUD integration and multi-club coverage. The vendor claims Android, Windows and iOS support and offers a free test through a Telegram bot. Prices are not published.

Shanky Holdem Bot

One of the oldest desktop poker bots, sold by Shanky Technologies as a Windows program that plays from editable profiles. The Hold'em bot version 12.7.8 was posted on 12 August 2026, and separate Omaha bots cover PLO5. It is licensed software: you pay for the right to run it, whether you play or not, and it needs a Windows machine with the room client in a window.

Warbot

An OpenHoldem-based customizable bot for Windows that plays according to a loaded profile. Support for a specific room such as PPPoker depends on community profiles and settings discussed on the vendor's forum, which makes it a developer's tool as much as a player's. It is licensed, with a free trial.

PokerNet

Not a tool for players. PokerNet places managed bots in clubs and unions on PPPoker, PokerBros and ClubGG to keep NLH, PLO and Short Deck tables active, and is paid by revenue share with the club, with no upfront cost. If you run a club, it competes with hiring props; if you play, it is the thing you may be sitting against.

How to choose a bot for PPPoker

Start from your device, not from the feature list. A player who grinds on a phone has two realistic options, the assistant and PokerBotAI, plus CrownAI if its Android claim holds up in the free test. Desktop bots need a Windows PC with the room running in a window, and on PPPoker that means an emulator anyway.

Then check formats. Club pools on PPPoker are full of PLO5, Short Deck and OFC tables, and those are exactly the games where Hold'em-first bots stop. If you play anything other than NLH, read the format column before anything else.

Then look at how the price is stated. A published per-hand rate lets you calculate a session before you sit down; a licence lets you calculate a month; a price on request lets you calculate nothing until a manager replies. None of the three is wrong, but only the first two can be compared on this page.

Finally, decide whether you are a player or an operator. Club owners have a different problem, empty tables, and a different tool, managed activity from services such as PokerNet. A player tool will not solve it, and an operator service will not help a player.

Whatever you pick, every one of these tools breaks the PPPoker terms for players. The anti-cheat guide explains what that means in practice, and it applies to the assistant as much as to the others.

A practical order of checks before you send money to anyone: confirm the tool runs on your device, confirm it lists your formats, ask for the trial, play 30 hands at your usual stake and compare what the tool suggested with what you would have done. If the two never differ, the tool is not adding an edge; if they differ on every hand, one of you is wrong, and the stats will tell you which.

Pricing models: licence, per hand, on request, revenue share

Four ways to pay show up in the table, and each shapes how the tool is used.

Licence. Shanky and Warbot sell the right to run the software for a period. It rewards volume: the more you play, the cheaper each hand becomes. It punishes breaks, because the clock runs whether you play or not, and it ties you to a Windows machine.

Per hand. The assistant deducts fuel for every hand from a prepaid balance. At NL $0.10/$0.20 that is 90 credits per 100 hands; the rate rises with the big blind. Nothing is charged while you are away, fuel never expires, and the rate for the exact table is shown before you sit. Heavy volume at high stakes costs more than a licence would, which is the honest downside.

On request. PokerBotAI and CrownAI publish no prices. That is common in this niche, since vendors negotiate per player, but it means you cannot budget before a conversation, and it makes comparisons like this one incomplete by design.

Revenue share. PokerNet takes a share of what the club earns from the tables its bots keep running, with no upfront cost to the operator. It aligns the vendor with the club owner, and it has nothing to offer a player.

For a part-time player at low stakes, per-hand fuel is the cheapest of the four because idle time is free. For a full-time grinder at NL $0.50/$1.00 and above, a licence can be cheaper if the bot covers the formats you play. Run the numbers on the pricing page against your own hand volume before you decide.

Three club tables rated by PPPoker AI Software: green for a soft lineup, yellow for average players with moderate EV — PPPoker format support by tool

PPPoker format support by tool

Formats are where the tools differ most, because PPPoker clubs run far more than Hold'em. The table repeats what each vendor states; a dash means the format is not mentioned on the vendor's site, not that it is impossible.

FormatThe assistantPokerBotAICrownAIShankyWarbotPokerNet
NLHYesYesYesYesBy profileYes
PLO4YesYesYesSeparate Omaha botBy profileYes
PLO5 / PLO6YesYesYesPLO5 in the Omaha bot--
Short DeckYes----Yes
MTT / SNGYes-MTT-By profile-
OFCYesYes----
All-in or FoldYes-----

If your union runs mostly PLO5 and Short Deck, the table narrows the field quickly. If you only play NLH cash, every tool on the list is a candidate and the decision moves to platform and price.

NLH table with the assistant icon, hand counters and a won pot of 317 chips — Detection risk by type of tool

Detection risk by type of tool

No vendor can promise that a bot is undetectable, and any page that does should be read with care. What can be said is that the risk differs by how the tool works and how it is used.

Advisor mode on a phone. The assistant without the autoclicker reads the screen and shows a prompt; the human still taps the button. Timing stays human, session length stays human, and the account looks like a player who studies. This is the lowest-risk way to use assistance, and the one to start with.

Automated play. The moment a tool presses the buttons, the timing pattern becomes the tell. Identical reaction times on every decision and sessions no person would sit through are what club owners notice first. That applies to the autoclicker in the assistant, to PokerBotAI and CrownAI in bot mode, and to Shanky and Warbot by design.

Desktop bots through an emulator. Shanky and Warbot need the room in a Windows window, which on PPPoker means an emulator plus a bot plus screen-scraping. More layers, more things that behave unlike a phone.

Managed operator bots. PokerNet's bots sit in the club with the owner's knowledge, so detection by the club is not the question; detection by the platform and by other players is.

What raises the risk with any tool: several accounts at one table, marathon sessions, playing only when the assistant says a table is green and leaving the second it turns red, and complaints from regulars who notice. What lowers it: advisor mode, human breaks, one account, and keeping only small balances with the agent so a ban is an annoyance rather than a disaster.

Research bots and solvers versus a club assistant

Search results for a PPPoker bot mix in a different kind of software: research bots and solver trainers. Slumbot is a heads-up no-limit bot built for academic evaluation; Pluribus was the six-player bot that beat professionals in a lab; GTO Wizard AI is a solver and training tool that lets you study equilibrium strategy and play practice hands against it. Articles about crushing a top HUNL poker bot or evaluating AI poker bots are about these systems, and they say nothing about club apps.

The difference is the job. A solver answers the question of what a balanced strategy looks like in a spot with known ranges; it is a study tool, and a new era in training for anyone willing to put in the hours. An assistant such as the assistant answers a different question in real time: what to do now, at this PPPoker table, against these opponents, with their stats in hand. It uses a GTO baseline for the same reason a solver does, then leaves it whenever the exploit layer sees a leak worth attacking.

Club poker also breaks assumptions that heads-up research relies on. Pots are often multiway, and three-way pot heuristics differ from heads-up equilibrium; implied odds change with stack depth and with how loose the table is; short-stacked recreational players do not play the ranges a solver expects. The poker concepts you may be using wrong in a club game, from implied odds to when a bluff is worth it, are the concepts the assistant re-evaluates on every street from the actual stats rather than from a theoretical range.

So the comparison to make is not the assistant against Slumbot or GTO Wizard. Use a solver to learn; use the assistant, or none of the tools on this page, at the table.

Dedicated servers and virtual machines: not needed here

Guides to running poker bots on dedicated servers describe a desktop-bot world: a Windows machine per bot, virtual machines under Proxmox for multi-bot setups, remote desktops, and stealth strategies to avoid detection by making each VM look like a separate computer. That infrastructure exists because Shanky and Warbot are Windows programs that need the room client in a window, and because their users often run several instances at once.

The assistant does not need any of it. The assistant is an Android app that sits next to the PPPoker build on a phone, or inside LDPlayer on an ordinary PC with 2 cores and 3072 MB per instance. There is no server rental, no hypervisor, no remote session to keep alive, and no monthly hosting bill to add to the software cost. A second table is a second LDPlayer window, not a second machine.

The multi-VM approach also carries the risk that this page keeps returning to. Several instances usually mean several accounts, and several accounts at one table is the multi-accounting that gets players removed from clubs with their chips kept. Whatever hardware you run, the safe configuration is one account per person and extra windows only for extra tables.

If you are a club owner rather than a player, the server question is real, and it is exactly what PokerNet sells as managed activity; for a player, the phone in your hand is the whole setup.

Which tool suits which player

You play on an Android phone. The assistant is built for exactly this: it installs next to the PPPoker build, rates the tables and advises on every street, and the per-hand fuel means a short session costs cents. PokerBotAI is the Android alternative if you prefer to negotiate through a manager.

You play PLO5, PLO6 or OFC. Only the Android assistants list these formats; Shanky covers PLO5 through a separate Omaha bot and Warbot depends on whether a profile exists. The assistant lists all three, plus Short Deck and All-in or Fold.

You grind NLH on a Windows PC. If you want a fixed licence and are comfortable with profiles and screen mapping, Shanky and Warbot are the established desktop options. If you would rather run LDPlayer with a phone-style assistant and pay per hand, the assistant works on the emulator with 2 cores and 3072 MB per instance.

You want to test before paying. The assistant offers free trial fuel, CrownAI a free test through its Telegram bot, Warbot a free trial. PokerBotAI and Shanky do not state a trial on their sites.

You run a club or union. None of the player tools address your problem. PokerNet's managed activity, paid by revenue share, is the product designed for operators.

Whoever you are, read the risk section first and the explanation of clubs, unions and agents second; the software is the smallest of the three decisions.

Comparison questions

Which PPPoker bot is the best?

There is no single best one. The assistant stands out on a published per-hand price, free trial fuel and PLO5, PLO6 and OFC support. Desktop grinders may prefer a Shanky or Warbot licence, and club owners are served by PokerNet.

Is there a free PPPoker bot?

Open-source projects exist on GitHub, but they need building, table mapping and profiles, and none is made for the PPPoker Android client. Paid tools, including the assistant, usually offer a free trial instead.

Which PPPoker bots work on Android?

The assistant and PokerBotAI run on Android; CrownAI claims Android as well. Shanky and Warbot are Windows programs.

Are PPPoker bots allowed?

No. Real-time assistance and automated play break the PPPoker terms, and clubs can remove players who use them and keep their chips.

How was this comparison made?

Only facts published on each vendor's own website were used, checked on 20 September 2026. Where a vendor does not publish something, the table says so.

Does PPPoker AI Software work with a HUD like PokerTracker?

It does not need one: it keeps its own database of 255+ stats per opponent and shows them at the table. Trackers on PPPoker need a hand converter, which is covered in the HUD guide.

Which bot is cheapest?

It depends on volume. Per-hand fuel is cheapest for part-time play because idle time is free; a licence can be cheaper for a full-time grinder at higher stakes. Tools with prices on request cannot be placed.

Test The assistant before you compare further

The quickest way to settle the comparison is a session on your own club tables with free trial fuel: install the assistant, enable PPPoker, and ask support on Telegram to activate the trial.

Download PPPoker AI Software